Element
A modern alternative to IRC or Discord. Good for team chats and groups.
Private alternatives to Discord, Slack, Microsoft Teams, vetted against our public criteria.
A modern alternative to IRC or Discord. Good for team chats and groups.
Professional approach for real-time conversations with your colleagues, other companies or customers.
Open-source team chat built around topic-based threading, fully self-hostable with managed hosting also available.
No matches for those filters.
Discord and Slack keep your community on their servers and mine the metadata around every message, and they can lock or read anything you store there. These platforms put the same channels and voice chat on infrastructure you or the community controls, most of them self-hostable and open source. You can run the server yourself or pay a vendor that sells software rather than your conversations, and either way the room belongs to you. These are the team chat platforms we recommend.
Discord and Slack are free or cheap because the platform is the product and your activity is the asset, and a settings page cannot change that arrangement. Server-side, they hold the full social graph of who talks to whom and how often, down to the channels you sit in, no matter which privacy toggles you flip. A toggle can hide a message from another member; it cannot hide the room from the company that owns it. There is no configuration for “stop being the host,” because hosting your community is the whole basis of the service. The only real fix is to own the server, or pay a host that sells software instead of data, which is what every pick on this page is built to let you do.
Self-hosting is the strongest version of this, since the data sits on a server you answer to and nobody else can quietly read or monetise it. If you would rather not run it, look for a managed plan from a company whose business is selling the software, ideally with end-to-end encryption for private rooms. Open-source code matters here more than almost anywhere, because a community accumulates years of conversation and you want the standing option to audit it or move it elsewhere. Rocket.Chat and Zulip take different approaches to the same idea, so weigh whether your group lives in fast channels or in organised threaded discussion.
Every platform here is measured against our public listing criteria: you can host it yourself or choose a vendor that does not mine the content, the code is open so you can audit or migrate later, private conversations can be properly encrypted, and the project is healthy enough to trust with years of a community’s history. We weigh how realistic the upkeep is for a volunteer admin, not just the feature list. We only list platforms we would run our own community on, and we are honest that owning the server means owning the responsibility too.
The trade is real: when you own the server, you become the admin. That means moderation and backups and keeping the lights on, which is more responsibility than clicking “create server” on a platform that handles it for you. What you gain in return is the thing the mainstream services cannot offer, a community whose conversations and social graph belong to the people in it rather than a company selling around them. For many groups that ownership is worth the work, and a managed plan splits the difference by handing the infrastructure to a vendor you chose on merit.
Stand up one of these for your core group and re-create your channels and roles, then run it alongside the old server while people migrate. Communities move on social proof, so seed the new space with your most active members first and let the rest follow the activity. If you are leaving Discord specifically, our Discord alternatives page covers the move in detail. For the private side conversations a team always has, pair it with private messaging, and if you are untangling a workplace from Microsoft Teams, the escape Microsoft playbook puts the rest of that ecosystem in one place.