PrivacyTools.io
Reviewed by Gabriel Bachmann
paaster logo

paaster

paaster.io
1 rating so far*

An end-to-end encrypted pastebin that encrypts content in the browser using XChaCha20-Poly1305 and Argon2id before upload. The decryption key stays in the URL fragment and never reaches the server, with no opt-out: every paste is always encrypted.

Threat level
Covered

A covered pick. Anyone can use it as a private drop-in, with no setup or know-how. Enough for most people. Threat levels

Screenshot of the paaster website
Share
Our take

paaster takes the same zero-knowledge approach as PrivateBin but builds on more modern primitives: libsodium’s XChaCha20-Poly1305 secretstream with Argon2id key derivation, the same stack as VERNAM. Encryption is not a mode to enable. It is the only mode. Paste history, delete-after-view, and QR sharing are built in, and the project deliberately avoids dynamically loaded third-party scripts. It is a smaller, younger project than PrivateBin with fewer public instances; self-hosting is the most reliable path. A solid choice for anyone who wants the strongest available browser-side encryption on their pastes.

AGPL-3.0 b2dockerdrivee2eeend-to-end-encryptionpaasterpastepastebinprivacypythonrclones3self-hostedstore
Stars
568
+0 this week
Forks
27
2 watching
Last commit
today
healthy
Latest release
v3.6.2
13d ago, 22 total
Star history
Issues
96% closed
3
open
65
closed
+1 / -0
opened / closed, last 4 weeks
Opened vs closed, last 12 weeks
Commits, last 26 weeks
195 commits, active 22 of 26 weeks
9 contributors since Mar 2022
Languages
  • TypeScript 54.9%
  • Svelte 37.9%
  • CSS 6.4%
  • Other 0.8%
Updated daily from the GitHub API. Star tracking since Jun 22, 2026.
Website at a glance
paaster.io
D score 35
Weak website security headers
Graded by Mozilla HTTP Observatory, tested 1d ago

Measures the security configuration of the tool's own website, not the privacy of the product itself. A strong tool can still score low here.

paaster alternatives

paaster license, in plain English
AGPL-3.0
Strong copyleft · network

Free to use, even commercially. Changes must be published under the same license, and running a modified version as a network service counts as distributing it.

Permits

  • Commercial use
  • Modification
  • Distribution
  • Patent use
  • Private use

Requires

  • Disclose source
  • Network use is distribution
  • Same license
  • State changes
  • License and copyright notice

Does not provide

  • Liability cover
  • Warranty

Why it matters: The network clause is the point. Anyone who runs a modified version as a hosted service has to publish those changes, so the code handling your data stays inspectable. This is why privacy-first projects reach for AGPL.

Plain-language summary of the project's license, not legal advice. Read the full text for the exact terms.

* Average ratings will show on this page once the threshold of 5 ratings is reached.